Abstract
This research explores the civilian transition experiences of Commonwealth and Overseas Troops (C&OTs) veterans from the British Armed Forces (BAF), focusing on the challenges of career navigation and identity reformation. Drawing on Boltanski and Thévenot's "On Justification" (OJ) framework and Social Identity Theory (SIT), the study conducts thematic analysis of interviews with 42 veterans. Key findings highlight three central dynamics: (1) identity balancing, where veterans struggle to integrate their dual migrant and military selves, complicating professional roles and self-concept; (2) existential valour, particularly among Black veterans, whose racial identity acts as both a source of resilience and a barrier to civilian inclusion; and (3) career and status recognition, involving persistent difficulties in having military skills and experiences valued, which undermines belonging and labour market integration. These tensions reveal deep challenges to inclusion, shedding light on stereotype threats and exclusionary practices. By amplifying underrepresented minority veteran narratives, the research advances identity work scholarship and enriches SIT and OJ applications in military transition contexts. It offers practical HRM recommendations to promote genuine inclusion, combat biases, and support equitable post-service career pathways for diverse veterans.